{"id":33005,"date":"2026-03-31T02:50:52","date_gmt":"2026-03-31T01:50:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.martinaocadlikova.cz\/cs\/jak-vest-tezky-rozhovor-se-zamestnancem\/"},"modified":"2026-03-31T02:50:52","modified_gmt":"2026-03-31T01:50:52","slug":"jak-vest-tezky-rozhovor-se-zamestnancem","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.martinaocadlikova.cz\/cs\/jak-vest-tezky-rozhovor-se-zamestnancem\/","title":{"rendered":"Jak v\u00e9st t\u011b\u017ek\u00fd rozhovor se zam\u011bstnancem"},"content":{"rendered":"

Jsou rozhovory, kter\u00e9 se neodkl\u00e1daj\u00ed proto, \u017ee by nebyl \u010das, ale proto, \u017ee jejich cena je vysok\u00e1. Mana\u017eer v\u00ed, \u017ee mus\u00ed otev\u0159\u00edt t\u00e9ma v\u00fdkonu, chov\u00e1n\u00ed nebo naru\u0161en\u00e9 spolupr\u00e1ce. Z\u00e1rove\u0148 tu\u0161\u00ed, \u017ee jeden nep\u0159esn\u00fd v\u00fdrok m\u016f\u017ee spustit obranu, pop\u0159en\u00ed, proti\u00fatok nebo tich\u00e9 sta\u017een\u00ed. Pr\u00e1v\u011b v takov\u00e9 chv\u00edli d\u00e1v\u00e1 smysl \u0159e\u0161it, jak v\u00e9st t\u011b\u017ek\u00fd rozhovor se zam\u011bstnancem tak, aby ne\u0161lo o uvoln\u011bn\u00ed vlastn\u00edho nap\u011bt\u00ed, ale o p\u0159esn\u00e9 veden\u00ed situace.<\/p>\n

T\u011b\u017ek\u00fd rozhovor nen\u00ed n\u00e1ro\u010dn\u00fd jen obsahem. N\u00e1ro\u010dn\u00fd je hlavn\u011b t\u00edm, co v n\u011bm b\u00fdv\u00e1 sm\u00edchan\u00e9 dohromady. Fakta, dojmy, star\u0161\u00ed k\u0159ivdy, obavy z reakce druh\u00e9ho, pot\u0159eba b\u00fdt f\u00e9r, tlak na v\u00fdsledek a \u010dasto i nevy\u0159\u010den\u00e1 ot\u00e1zka, zda m\u00e1m na takov\u00fd rozhovor v\u016fbec pr\u00e1vo. Kdy\u017e se tohle neodd\u011bl\u00ed, rozhovor se rychle rozpadne. M\u00edsto jasn\u00e9ho sd\u011blen\u00ed vznik\u00e1 mlha, ve kter\u00e9 si ka\u017ed\u00fd odnese n\u011bco jin\u00e9ho.<\/p>\n

Jak v\u00e9st t\u011b\u017ek\u00fd rozhovor se zam\u011bstnancem bez zbyte\u010dn\u00e9 eskalace<\/h2>\n

Prvn\u00ed pr\u00e1ce za\u010d\u00edn\u00e1 je\u0161t\u011b p\u0159ed sch\u016fzkou. Ne u formulac\u00ed, ale u reality. Co p\u0159esn\u011b se d\u011bje? Jak\u00e9 chov\u00e1n\u00ed, jak \u010dasto, v jak\u00e9m kontextu a s jak\u00fdm dopadem? Pokud mana\u017eer vstupuje do rozhovoru se v\u011btami typu \u201edlouhodob\u011b to nefunguje\u201c nebo \u201elid\u00e9 s v\u00e1mi maj\u00ed probl\u00e9m\u201c, nep\u0159in\u00e1\u0161\u00ed oporu, ale tlak. Takov\u00e9 v\u00fdroky se t\u011b\u017eko uchopuj\u00ed a druh\u00fd se proti nim logicky br\u00e1n\u00ed.<\/p>\n

P\u0159esn\u011bj\u0161\u00ed je \u0159\u00edct, co bylo vid\u011bt. Nap\u0159\u00edklad \u017ee term\u00edn byl t\u0159ikr\u00e1t posunut bez v\u010dasn\u00e9 informace, \u017ee na porad\u011b zam\u011bstnanec opakovan\u011b p\u0159eru\u0161oval kolegyni, nebo \u017ee p\u0159edan\u00fd v\u00fdstup neodpov\u00eddal domluven\u00e9mu zad\u00e1n\u00ed. Ne proto, aby byl rozhovor tvrd\u0161\u00ed, ale aby byl v\u016fbec pou\u017eiteln\u00fd. \u010c\u00edm konkr\u00e9tn\u011bj\u0161\u00ed realita, t\u00edm men\u0161\u00ed prostor pro posun do osobn\u00edch interpretac\u00ed.<\/p>\n

Stejn\u011b d\u016fle\u017eit\u00e9 je odd\u011blit, co je fakt a co je v\u00e1\u0161 v\u00fdklad. Fakt je, \u017ee zam\u011bstnanec neodpov\u011bd\u011bl dva dny na kl\u00ed\u010dov\u00fd e-mail. Interpretace je, \u017ee mu na v\u011bci nez\u00e1le\u017e\u00ed. Fakt je, \u017ee zv\u00fd\u0161il hlas. Interpretace je, \u017ee je nerespektuj\u00edc\u00ed. Interpretace n\u011bkdy m\u016f\u017ee b\u00fdt spr\u00e1vn\u00e1, ale kdy\u017e ji p\u0159edlo\u017e\u00edte jako hotovou pravdu, rozhovor se \u010dasto sto\u010d\u00ed do sporu o motivy m\u00edsto toho, aby \u0159e\u0161il chov\u00e1n\u00ed a jeho dopad.<\/p>\n

To neznamen\u00e1 b\u00fdt m\u011bkk\u00fd. Znamen\u00e1 to b\u00fdt p\u0159esn\u00fd. Tvrdost bez p\u0159esnosti b\u00fdv\u00e1 jen forma \u00falevy pro toho, kdo mluv\u00ed.<\/p>\n

P\u0159\u00edprava nen\u00ed sc\u00e9n\u00e1\u0159, ale orientace<\/h2>\n

Lid\u00e9 si \u010dasto p\u0159edstavuj\u00ed, \u017ee kdy\u017e si dop\u0159edu p\u0159iprav\u00ed spr\u00e1vn\u00e9 v\u011bty, rozhovor zvl\u00e1dnou. Jen\u017ee t\u011b\u017ek\u00e9 rozhovory se nerozpadnou kv\u016fli jedn\u00e9 \u0161patn\u00e9 v\u011bt\u011b. Rozpadnou se ve chv\u00edli, kdy ztrat\u00edte orientaci v tom, co je c\u00edlem, co je vedlej\u0161\u00ed t\u00e9ma a co u\u017e je obrann\u00e1 dynamika.<\/p>\n

P\u0159ed sch\u016fzkou je u\u017eite\u010dn\u00e9 vyjasnit si t\u0159i body. Co p\u0159esn\u011b pot\u0159ebujete pojmenovat. K \u010demu m\u00e1 rozhovor v\u00e9st. A co budete d\u011blat, kdy\u017e druh\u00fd za\u010dne uh\u00fdbat, zpochyb\u0148ovat nebo obracet t\u00e9ma proti v\u00e1m.<\/p>\n

C\u00edl nem\u00e1 b\u00fdt neur\u010dit\u00fd. Nesta\u010d\u00ed cht\u00edt \u201evy\u010distit vzduch\u201c. Pot\u0159ebujete v\u011bd\u011bt, zda jde o korekci konkr\u00e9tn\u00edho chov\u00e1n\u00ed, vyjasn\u011bn\u00ed hranic<\/a>, rozhodnut\u00ed o dal\u0161\u00edm postupu nebo ov\u011b\u0159en\u00ed, zda je zam\u011bstnanec v\u016fbec schopen zm\u011bnu un\u00e9st. Tyto c\u00edle se mezi sebou li\u0161\u00ed. Pokud je sm\u00edch\u00e1te, p\u016fsob\u00edte ne\u010diteln\u011b.<\/p>\n

Pom\u00e1h\u00e1 tak\u00e9 v\u0161imnout si vlastn\u00edho vnit\u0159n\u00edho nastaven\u00ed. Jdete do rozhovoru s pot\u0159ebou b\u00fdt pochopeni? S pocitem viny? Se strachem, \u017ee budete p\u016fsobit necitliv\u011b? Nebo naopak s nahromad\u011bnou iritac\u00ed, kterou chcete kone\u010dn\u011b vypustit? To v\u0161echno ovlivn\u00ed t\u00f3n. T\u011b\u017ek\u00fd rozhovor \u010dasto nezkaz\u00ed obsah, ale neregulovan\u00e1 vnit\u0159n\u00ed reakce<\/a> vedouc\u00edho.<\/p>\n

Co ne\u0159e\u0161it v jednom sezen\u00ed<\/h3>\n

N\u011bkdy je pot\u0159eba \u0159\u00edct m\u00e9n\u011b, ne v\u00edce. Pokud se vr\u0161\u00ed probl\u00e9m v\u00fdkonu, nap\u011bt\u00ed v t\u00fdmu, nejasn\u00e1 role a je\u0161t\u011b osobn\u00ed antipatie, nen\u00ed rozumn\u00e9 otev\u0159\u00edt v\u0161e najednou. Druh\u00fd pak nev\u00ed, co je hlavn\u00ed probl\u00e9m, a p\u0159irozen\u011b hled\u00e1 nejslab\u0161\u00ed m\u00edsto v argumentaci.<\/p>\n

Lep\u0161\u00ed je rozhodnout, kter\u00e9 t\u00e9ma je te\u010f nosn\u00e9. Nap\u0159\u00edklad \u017ee dnes \u0159e\u0161\u00edte zp\u016fsob komunikace na porad\u00e1ch a jeho dopad na t\u00fdmovou spolupr\u00e1ci. Ostatn\u00ed v\u011bci m\u016f\u017eete zaznamenat, ale nechat stranou. P\u0159esnost nen\u00ed redukce slo\u017eitosti. Je to zp\u016fsob, jak ji udr\u017eet \u0159iditelnou.<\/p>\n

V samotn\u00e9m rozhovoru: klid, struktura, hranice<\/h2>\n

Dob\u0159e veden\u00fd rozhovor neza\u010d\u00edn\u00e1 omluvn\u00fdm krou\u017een\u00edm kolem t\u00e9matu. Ani p\u0159epadem. Za\u010d\u00edn\u00e1 jasn\u00fdm r\u00e1mcem. Pot\u0159ebujete druh\u00e9mu \u0159\u00edct, pro\u010d spolu mluv\u00edte a co je p\u0159edm\u011btem rozhovoru. Kr\u00e1tce, bez dlouh\u00e9 p\u0159\u00edpravy p\u016fdy.<\/p>\n

Nap\u0159\u00edklad: dnes chci otev\u0159\u00edt dv\u011b konkr\u00e9tn\u00ed situace z posledn\u00edch t\u00fddn\u016f, kter\u00e9 maj\u00ed dopad na fungov\u00e1n\u00ed t\u00fdmu. Pot\u0159ebuji je s v\u00e1mi proj\u00edt a vyjasnit dal\u0161\u00ed o\u010dek\u00e1v\u00e1n\u00ed. T\u00edm nastavujete orientaci i hranice. Druh\u00fd v\u00ed, \u017ee nejde o nejasn\u00fd osobn\u00ed soud, ale o pracovn\u00ed t\u00e9ma, kter\u00e9 m\u00e1 konkr\u00e9tn\u00ed obsah.<\/p>\n

Potom p\u0159ich\u00e1z\u00ed popis reality. Co se stalo, kdy, v jak\u00e9 situaci a jak\u00fd to m\u011blo dopad. Teprve potom m\u00e1 smysl d\u00e1t prostor druh\u00e9 stran\u011b. Ne jako gesto, ale jako sou\u010d\u00e1st mapov\u00e1n\u00ed. Je rozd\u00edl mezi t\u00edm, kdy\u017e zam\u011bstnanec nab\u00edz\u00ed kontext, a kdy\u017e pou\u017e\u00edv\u00e1 vysv\u011btlen\u00ed jako \u00fanik z odpov\u011bdnosti. Pr\u00e1v\u011b tady mus\u00ed vedouc\u00ed udr\u017eet osu rozhovoru.<\/p>\n

Kdy\u017e zam\u011bstnanec \u0159ekne, \u017ee byl pod tlakem, m\u016f\u017ee to b\u00fdt relevantn\u00ed informace. Ale sama o sob\u011b nema\u017ee dopad chov\u00e1n\u00ed. Pokud tlak vysv\u011btluje opakovan\u00fd probl\u00e9m, neznamen\u00e1 to je\u0161t\u011b, \u017ee je probl\u00e9m vy\u0159e\u0161en. V praxi je \u010dasto pot\u0159eba um\u011bt sou\u010dasn\u011b uznat kontext a neustoupit z n\u00e1roku na zm\u011bnu.<\/p>\n

T\u00f3n je podstatn\u00fd. Klid nep\u016fsob\u00ed slab\u011b. Naopak. U t\u011b\u017ek\u00e9ho rozhovoru b\u00fdv\u00e1 nejv\u011bt\u0161\u00ed oporou schopnost neurychlit tempo jen proto, \u017ee druh\u00fd za\u010dne b\u00fdt emotivn\u00ed, defenzivn\u00ed nebo \u00fato\u010dn\u00fd. Kdy\u017e mana\u017eer zrychl\u00ed, za\u010dne vysv\u011btlovat, obhajovat se nebo vr\u0161it argumenty, \u010dasto t\u00edm nev\u011bdomky p\u0159ed\u00e1v\u00e1 veden\u00ed rozhovoru druh\u00e9 stran\u011b.<\/p>\n

Kdy\u017e p\u0159ijde obrana, ml\u010den\u00ed nebo proti\u00fatok<\/h3>\n

Pr\u00e1v\u011b tady se ukazuje, zda v\u00edte, jak v\u00e9st t\u011b\u017ek\u00fd rozhovor se zam\u011bstnancem i pod tlakem, ne jen v p\u0159ipraven\u00e9m sc\u00e9n\u00e1\u0159i. Typick\u00e1 obrana vypad\u00e1 r\u016fzn\u011b. Zleh\u010den\u00ed, pop\u0159en\u00ed, p\u0159esm\u011brov\u00e1n\u00ed na chyby ostatn\u00edch, siln\u00e1 emotivn\u00ed reakce nebo \u00fapln\u00e9 sta\u017een\u00ed.<\/p>\n

Na zleh\u010den\u00ed nepom\u00e1h\u00e1 p\u0159itvrdit, ale vr\u00e1tit se k fakt\u016fm. Na proti\u00fatok nepom\u00e1h\u00e1 osobn\u00ed obrana, ale dr\u017een\u00ed t\u00e9matu. Na ml\u010den\u00ed nepom\u00e1h\u00e1 nerv\u00f3zn\u00ed vypl\u0148ov\u00e1n\u00ed prostoru, ale klidn\u00e1 ot\u00e1zka, co z toho druh\u00fd sly\u0161\u00ed a \u010demu rozum\u00ed jinak.<\/p>\n

Pokud zam\u011bstnanec za\u010dne vytahovat star\u00e9 k\u0159ivdy nebo chyby veden\u00ed, je n\u011bkdy nam\u00edst\u011b uznat, \u017ee i to m\u016f\u017ee b\u00fdt relevantn\u00ed t\u00e9ma. Z\u00e1rove\u0148 je pot\u0159eba nenechat si j\u00edm rozb\u00edt aktu\u00e1ln\u00ed osu rozhovoru. M\u016f\u017eete \u0159\u00edct, \u017ee to sly\u0161\u00edte a m\u016f\u017eete se k tomu vr\u00e1tit, ale te\u010f pot\u0159ebujete dokon\u010dit konkr\u00e9tn\u00ed bod, kv\u016fli kter\u00e9mu sch\u016fzka vznikla. To nen\u00ed vyh\u00fdb\u00e1n\u00ed. To je \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed rozhovoru.<\/p>\n

Nejt\u011b\u017e\u0161\u00ed \u010d\u00e1st: nezam\u011bnit empatii za \u00fastup<\/h2>\n

Mnoho vedouc\u00edch selh\u00e1v\u00e1 ne proto, \u017ee by byli necitliv\u00ed, ale proto\u017ee ve chv\u00edli nepohody za\u010dnou tlak tlumit na \u00fakor jasnosti. Jakmile druh\u00fd uk\u00e1\u017ee stud, l\u00edtost nebo frustraci, mana\u017eer za\u010dne sv\u00e9 sd\u011blen\u00ed rozm\u011bk\u010dovat, relativizovat nebo couvat. V\u00fdsledek b\u00fdv\u00e1 dvoj\u00ed. Kr\u00e1tkodob\u011b se ulev\u00ed nap\u011bt\u00ed, dlouhodob\u011b ale z\u016fstane nejasn\u00e9, co se m\u00e1 zm\u011bnit.<\/p>\n

Empatie neznamen\u00e1 zmen\u0161it realitu, aby byla pro druh\u00e9ho snesiteln\u011bj\u0161\u00ed. Znamen\u00e1 un\u00e9st, \u017ee sd\u011blen\u00ed m\u016f\u017ee b\u00fdt nep\u0159\u00edjemn\u00e9, a p\u0159esto z\u016fstat v\u011bcn\u00fd a respektuj\u00edc\u00ed. To je rozd\u00edl. U t\u011b\u017ek\u00fdch rozhovor\u016f je respekt vid\u011bt sp\u00ed\u0161 v p\u0159esnosti ne\u017e v uklid\u0148uj\u00edc\u00edch v\u011bt\u00e1ch<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Na druh\u00e9 stran\u011b ani p\u0159\u00edli\u0161n\u00e1 strohost nen\u00ed v\u017edy zn\u00e1mkou s\u00edly. Pokud vedouc\u00ed mluv\u00ed tak odpojen\u011b, \u017ee nen\u00ed schopen vn\u00edmat, co se v druh\u00e9m d\u011bje, snadno p\u0159ehl\u00e9dne moment, kdy se rozhovor p\u0159est\u00e1v\u00e1 potk\u00e1vat s realitou a m\u011bn\u00ed se v jednostrann\u00e9 ozn\u00e1men\u00ed. N\u011bkdy je pot\u0159eba zpomalit a ov\u011b\u0159it, zda druh\u00fd skute\u010dn\u011b rozum\u00ed tomu, co je probl\u00e9m a co se od n\u011bj o\u010dek\u00e1v\u00e1.<\/p>\n

Po rozhovoru se uk\u00e1\u017ee, co bylo skute\u010dn\u011b \u0159e\u010deno<\/h2>\n

Rozhovor nekon\u010d\u00ed posledn\u00ed v\u011btou ve dve\u0159\u00edch. Teprve n\u00e1sledn\u00e9 chov\u00e1n\u00ed uk\u00e1\u017ee, jestli bylo sd\u011blen\u00ed jasn\u00e9. Proto je u\u017eite\u010dn\u00e9 uzav\u0159\u00edt sch\u016fzku konkr\u00e9tn\u011b. Co se m\u00e1 zm\u011bnit, v jak\u00e9m horizontu, podle \u010deho to pozn\u00e1te a kdy se k tomu vr\u00e1t\u00edte. Bez t\u00e9to \u010d\u00e1sti z\u016fst\u00e1v\u00e1 rozhovor \u010dasto jen siln\u00fdm momentem bez p\u0159enosu do praxe.<\/p>\n

N\u011bkdy se zm\u011bna objev\u00ed rychle. Jindy zam\u011bstnanec na sch\u016fzce souhlas\u00ed, ale v realit\u011b se vrac\u00ed ke stejn\u00e9mu vzorci. To nen\u00ed detail. Je to informace. Ukazuje, zda \u0161lo o jednor\u00e1zov\u00e9 selh\u00e1n\u00ed, neporozum\u011bn\u00ed, nedostatek kompetence, nebo o hlub\u0161\u00ed probl\u00e9m v postoji, kapacit\u011b \u010di schopnosti n\u00e9st odpov\u011bdnost.<\/p>\n

A pr\u00e1v\u011b tady b\u00fdv\u00e1 pro vedouc\u00ed nep\u0159\u00edjemn\u00e9 zji\u0161t\u011bn\u00ed. T\u011b\u017ek\u00fd rozhovor nen\u00ed n\u00e1stroj, kter\u00fd zaru\u010d\u00ed dobrou reakci druh\u00e9 strany. Je to zp\u016fsob, jak vr\u00e1tit do situace realitu, hranice a \u010ditelnost. N\u011bkdy to vztah zlep\u0161\u00ed. N\u011bkdy odhal\u00ed, \u017ee probl\u00e9m je hlub\u0161\u00ed, ne\u017e se zd\u00e1lo. Oboj\u00ed je cenn\u00e9.<\/p>\n

V\u00e9st takov\u00fd rozhovor dob\u0159e neznamen\u00e1 m\u00edt v\u0161e pod kontrolou. Znamen\u00e1 nerozpadnout se v ciz\u00ed reakci ani ve vlastn\u00ed nejistot\u011b a udr\u017eet kontakt s t\u00edm, co je skute\u010dn\u011b p\u0159ed v\u00e1mi. Pr\u00e1v\u011b tam za\u010d\u00edn\u00e1 autorita, kter\u00e1 nen\u00ed postaven\u00e1 na tlaku, ale na opor\u011b ve vlastn\u00edm \u00fasudku.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Jak v\u00e9st t\u011b\u017ek\u00fd rozhovor se zam\u011bstnancem bez zbyte\u010dn\u00fdch \u0161kod? P\u0159esn\u011b, klidn\u011b a s oporou v realit\u011b, ne v domn\u011bnk\u00e1ch a tlaku.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":33006,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":""},"categories":[112],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-33005","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-vzorce-chovani-a-reakce"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.martinaocadlikova.cz\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33005","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.martinaocadlikova.cz\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.martinaocadlikova.cz\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.martinaocadlikova.cz\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.martinaocadlikova.cz\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=33005"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.martinaocadlikova.cz\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33005\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.martinaocadlikova.cz\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/33006"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.martinaocadlikova.cz\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=33005"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.martinaocadlikova.cz\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=33005"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.martinaocadlikova.cz\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=33005"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}