{"id":33903,"date":"2026-07-27T07:27:56","date_gmt":"2026-07-27T06:27:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.martinaocadlikova.cz\/cs\/jak-udrzet-autoritu-bez-tvrdosti-v-konfliktu\/"},"modified":"2026-07-27T07:27:56","modified_gmt":"2026-07-27T06:27:56","slug":"jak-udrzet-autoritu-bez-tvrdosti-v-konfliktu","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.martinaocadlikova.cz\/cs\/jak-udrzet-autoritu-bez-tvrdosti-v-konfliktu\/","title":{"rendered":"Jak udr\u017eet autoritu bez tvrdosti v konfliktu"},"content":{"rendered":"

N\u011bkdy sta\u010d\u00ed jeden rozhovor, aby \u010dlov\u011bk za\u010dal pochybovat, zda m\u00e1 v\u016fbec pr\u00e1vo n\u011bco po\u017eadovat. D\u00edt\u011b se rozpl\u00e1\u010de a rodi\u010d povol\u00ed. Kolega zv\u00fd\u0161\u00ed hlas a vedouc\u00ed za\u010dne vysv\u011btlovat v\u00edc, ne\u017e je pot\u0159eba. Partner prohl\u00e1s\u00ed, \u017ee jste \u201ezase p\u0159ecitliv\u011bl\u00ed\u201c, a p\u016fvodn\u00ed t\u00e9ma se nen\u00e1padn\u011b p\u0159esune k tomu, zda nen\u00ed probl\u00e9m ve v\u00e1s. Ot\u00e1zka, jak udr\u017eet autoritu bez tvrdosti<\/strong>, se obvykle neobjevuje ve chv\u00edli klidu. P\u0159ich\u00e1z\u00ed a\u017e tam, kde druh\u00fd \u010dlov\u011bk tla\u010d\u00ed, odporuje, zpochyb\u0148uje nebo v\u00e1s nut\u00ed obhajovat n\u011bco, co jste je\u0161t\u011b p\u0159ed chv\u00edl\u00ed pova\u017eovali za zcela p\u0159im\u011b\u0159en\u00e9.<\/p>\n

Tvrdost se \u010dasto tv\u00e1\u0159\u00ed jako autorita, proto\u017ee je vid\u011bt a sly\u0161et. M\u00e1 pevn\u00fd t\u00f3n, rychl\u00fd verdikt a n\u011bkdy i okam\u017eit\u00fd \u00fa\u010dinek. Jen\u017ee autorita nevznik\u00e1 z toho, \u017ee druh\u00e9ho p\u0159ev\u00e1lcujeme. Vznik\u00e1 z toho, \u017ee dok\u00e1\u017eeme z\u016fstat v kontaktu s realitou situace, se svou rol\u00ed a s hranic\u00ed, kterou nen\u00ed pot\u0159eba ani omlouvat, ani prosazovat silou.<\/p>\n

To je n\u00e1ro\u010dn\u011bj\u0161\u00ed, ne\u017e zn\u00ed. Zvl\u00e1\u0161\u0165 pro lidi, kte\u0159\u00ed jsou zvykl\u00ed vn\u00edmat druh\u00e9, p\u0159edv\u00eddat jejich reakce a n\u00e9st odpov\u011bdnost za atmosf\u00e9ru v m\u00edstnosti. Pr\u00e1v\u011b oni \u010dasto zam\u011bn\u00ed klid za \u00fastupek a jasnost za necitlivost. Pak se pohybuj\u00ed mezi dv\u011bma nep\u0159\u00edjemn\u00fdmi polohami: bu\u010f ustoup\u00ed p\u0159\u00edli\u0161 brzy, nebo \u010dekaj\u00ed tak dlouho, a\u017e hranici sd\u011bl\u00ed podr\u00e1\u017ed\u011bn\u011b.<\/p>\n

Autorita nen\u00ed p\u0159evaha nad druh\u00fdm<\/h2>\n

Autorita nen\u00ed schopnost za\u0159\u00eddit, aby druh\u00fd souhlasil. Ani jistota, \u017ee druh\u00fd nebude zklaman\u00fd, rozzloben\u00fd nebo ura\u017een\u00fd. Takov\u00e1 p\u0159edstava vede k nekone\u010dn\u00e9mu vyjedn\u00e1v\u00e1n\u00ed o v\u011bcech, kter\u00e9 ve skute\u010dnosti vyjednateln\u00e9 nejsou.<\/p>\n

V praxi autorita znamen\u00e1, \u017ee \u010dlov\u011bk rozli\u0161uje mezi t\u00edm, co m\u016f\u017ee druh\u00e9mu vysv\u011btlit, a t\u00edm, co nemus\u00ed obhajovat. Nap\u0159\u00edklad rodi\u010d m\u016f\u017ee d\u00edt\u011bti uznat, \u017ee nechce odej\u00edt z h\u0159i\u0161t\u011b. Nemus\u00ed ale prom\u011bnit odchod v dlouhou debatu, ve kter\u00e9 d\u00edt\u011b rozhoduje o hranici, kterou dosp\u011bl\u00fd u\u017e stanovil. Vedouc\u00ed m\u016f\u017ee sly\u0161et nesouhlas \u010dlena t\u00fdmu, ani\u017e by ze strachu p\u0159ed konfliktem nechal rozpadnout domluven\u00fd r\u00e1mec pr\u00e1ce. Partner m\u016f\u017ee \u0159\u00edct: \u201eRozum\u00edm, \u017ee to vid\u00ed\u0161 jinak. P\u0159esto nechci, abys se mnou takto mluvil.\u201c<\/p>\n

V ka\u017ed\u00e9m z t\u011bchto p\u0159\u00edpad\u016f je druh\u00fd \u010dlov\u011bk br\u00e1n v\u00e1\u017en\u011b. Nen\u00ed ale postaven do pozice, kde ur\u010duje, zda va\u0161e hranice sm\u00ed existovat.<\/p>\n

Tohle rozli\u0161en\u00ed b\u00fdv\u00e1 jemn\u00e9. \u010casto ho naru\u0161\u00ed star\u00fd vzorec: kdy\u017e n\u011bkdo reaguje siln\u011b, za\u010dneme jeho reakci pova\u017eovat za d\u016fkaz, \u017ee jsme ud\u011blali n\u011bco \u0161patn\u011b. Pl\u00e1\u010d d\u00edt\u011bte se zm\u011bn\u00ed v d\u016fkaz, \u017ee jsme p\u0159\u00edli\u0161 p\u0159\u00edsn\u00ed. Hn\u011bv kolegy v d\u016fkaz, \u017ee jsme nespravedliv\u00ed. Partnerovo zklam\u00e1n\u00ed v d\u016fkaz, \u017ee jsme neciteln\u00ed. P\u0159itom reakce druh\u00e9ho m\u016f\u017ee b\u00fdt skute\u010dn\u00e1 a pochopiteln\u00e1, ale st\u00e1le nemus\u00ed ur\u010dovat va\u0161e rozhodnut\u00ed.<\/p>\n

Kde se autorita za\u010dne m\u011bnit v tvrdost<\/h2>\n

Tvrdost v\u011bt\u0161inou neza\u010d\u00edn\u00e1 zl\u00fdm \u00famyslem. \u010casto vznikne a\u017e po dlouh\u00e9m p\u0159izp\u016fsobov\u00e1n\u00ed. \u010clov\u011bk n\u011bkolikr\u00e1t ustoup\u00ed, p\u0159ehl\u00e9dne pozn\u00e1mku, posune vlastn\u00ed limit a sna\u017e\u00ed se udr\u017eet klid. Druh\u00e1 strana se mezit\u00edm nau\u010d\u00ed, \u017ee tlak funguje. Kdy\u017e pak p\u0159ijde dal\u0161\u00ed podobn\u00e1 situace, nen\u00ed v n\u00ed u\u017e jen p\u0159\u00edtomn\u00fd moment. Je v n\u00ed i nahromad\u011bn\u00e1 \u00fanava, nevy\u0159\u010den\u00fd vztek a pocit, \u017ee v\u00e1s nikdo nerespektuje.<\/p>\n

Pak zazn\u00ed v\u011bta, kter\u00e1 je mo\u017en\u00e1 v\u011bcn\u011b opr\u00e1vn\u011bn\u00e1, ale nese v sob\u011b i v\u0161e, co j\u00ed p\u0159edch\u00e1zelo: \u201eU\u017e toho m\u00e1m dost.\u201c Druh\u00fd \u010dlov\u011bk \u010dasto neusly\u0161\u00ed hranici. Usly\u0161\u00ed s\u00edlu, se kterou byla \u0159e\u010dena, a za\u010dne reagovat na t\u00f3n. P\u016fvodn\u00ed probl\u00e9m se op\u011bt vytrat\u00ed.<\/p>\n

Neznamen\u00e1 to, \u017ee zv\u00fd\u0161en\u00fd hlas automaticky ru\u0161\u00ed platnost hranice. N\u011bkdy je \u010dlov\u011bk pod tlakem a jeho reakce nen\u00ed dokonal\u00e1. Podstatn\u011bj\u0161\u00ed je v\u0161imnout si, co tvrdosti p\u0159edch\u00e1zelo. Byla hranice dlouho nejasn\u00e1? \u010cekali jste, a\u017e druh\u00fd s\u00e1m pochop\u00ed, co v\u00e1m vad\u00ed? Sna\u017eili jste se b\u00fdt tak ohledupln\u00ed, a\u017e jste p\u0159estali b\u00fdt \u010diteln\u00ed?<\/p>\n

Jasnost vysloven\u00e1 v\u010das b\u00fdv\u00e1 mnohem m\u00e9n\u011b tvrd\u00e1 ne\u017e hranice vysloven\u00e1 pozd\u011b. Ne proto, \u017ee by byla jemn\u011bj\u0161\u00ed formulac\u00ed. Proto, \u017ee je\u0161t\u011b nen\u00ed zat\u00ed\u017een\u00e1 dlouh\u00fdm vnit\u0159n\u00edm dluhem.<\/p>\n

Ne v\u0161echno je pot\u0159eba vysv\u011btlit do posledn\u00edho d\u016fvodu<\/h3>\n

Lid\u00e9, kte\u0159\u00ed se boj\u00ed p\u016fsobit tvrd\u011b, \u010dasto p\u0159id\u00e1vaj\u00ed k jednoduch\u00e9 v\u011bt\u011b mnoho vysv\u011btlen\u00ed. \u201eDnes to nem\u016f\u017eu ud\u011blat, proto\u017ee m\u00e1m je\u0161t\u011b toto, a nav\u00edc jsem posledn\u00ed dobou unaven\u00fd, ale ur\u010dit\u011b to neber osobn\u011b a p\u0159\u00ed\u0161t\u011b se pokus\u00edm…\u201c Takov\u00fd zp\u016fsob mluven\u00ed m\u00e1 dobr\u00fd \u00famysl. M\u00e1 druh\u00e9ho uklidnit a zabr\u00e1nit jeho nespokojenosti.<\/p>\n

N\u011bkdy ale vytv\u00e1\u0159\u00ed p\u0159esn\u00fd opak. \u010c\u00edm v\u00edce d\u016fvod\u016f nab\u00eddnete, t\u00edm v\u00edce materi\u00e1lu dost\u00e1v\u00e1 druh\u00fd k rozporov\u00e1n\u00ed. M\u016f\u017ee v\u00e1m vysv\u011btlit, \u017ee va\u0161e \u00fanava nen\u00ed dostate\u010dn\u00fd d\u016fvod, \u017ee ten \u00fakol zabere jen chv\u00edli nebo \u017ee p\u0159ece p\u0159\u00ed\u0161t\u011b m\u016f\u017eete n\u011bco zm\u011bnit. Rozhovor pak nen\u00ed o va\u0161em rozhodnut\u00ed, ale o tom, zda se v\u00e1m ho poda\u0159\u00ed dostate\u010dn\u011b obh\u00e1jit.<\/p>\n

Existuje rozd\u00edl mezi vysv\u011btlen\u00edm a obhajobou. Vysv\u011btlen\u00ed p\u0159in\u00e1\u0161\u00ed kontext, pokud vztahu slou\u017e\u00ed. Obhajoba vznik\u00e1 tam, kde se \u010dlov\u011bk sna\u017e\u00ed z\u00edskat povolen\u00ed k vlastn\u00edmu rozhodnut\u00ed. Autorita bez tvrdosti \u010dasto zn\u00ed prost\u011b: \u201eNe, dnes to nep\u0159evezmu.\u201c Nebo: \u201eTento zp\u016fsob komunikace nep\u0159ij\u00edm\u00e1m. M\u016f\u017eeme pokra\u010dovat, a\u017e budeme mluvit v\u011bcn\u011b.\u201c<\/p>\n

Takov\u00e1 v\u011bta nemus\u00ed b\u00fdt chladn\u00e1. M\u016f\u017ee b\u00fdt klidn\u00e1, m\u016f\u017ee obsahovat respekt, m\u016f\u017ee uznat nepohodl\u00ed druh\u00e9ho. Nemus\u00ed se v\u0161ak vzd\u00e1t sv\u00e9ho v\u00fdznamu jen proto, \u017ee druh\u00e9mu nen\u00ed p\u0159\u00edjemn\u00e1.<\/p>\n

Jak udr\u017eet autoritu bez tvrdosti, kdy\u017e druh\u00fd tla\u010d\u00ed<\/h2>\n

Ve vypjat\u00e9 situaci nepom\u00e1h\u00e1 hledat dokonalou formulaci. Pom\u00e1h\u00e1 nejd\u0159\u00edv p\u0159esn\u011b vid\u011bt, co se d\u011bje. Tlak m\u00e1 r\u016fzn\u00e9 podoby. N\u011bkdo nal\u00e9h\u00e1 p\u0159es nal\u00e9havost: \u201ePot\u0159ebuji to v\u011bd\u011bt hned.\u201c N\u011bkdo p\u0159es vinu: \u201ePo v\u0161em, co jsem pro tebe ud\u011blal.\u201c N\u011bkdo p\u0159es zpochybn\u011bn\u00ed: \u201eTy to zase moc \u0159e\u0161\u00ed\u0161.\u201c A n\u011bkdo p\u0159es zd\u00e1nlivou racionalitu, kter\u00e1 ve skute\u010dnosti neuzn\u00e1v\u00e1 \u017e\u00e1dnou jinou perspektivu ne\u017e svou.<\/p>\n

Kdy\u017e tlak rozpozn\u00e1te, nemus\u00edte na n\u011bj automaticky odpov\u011bd\u011bt. To nen\u00ed pasivita. Je to schopnost odd\u011blit nal\u00e9havost druh\u00e9ho od skute\u010dn\u00e9 nal\u00e9havosti situace. M\u016f\u017eete si vz\u00edt \u010das. M\u016f\u017eete zopakovat stejnou v\u011btu. M\u016f\u017eete odm\u00edtnout reagovat na vedlej\u0161\u00ed \u00fatok a vr\u00e1tit se k t\u00e9matu.<\/p>\n

P\u0159edstavme si rozhovor, ve kter\u00e9m v\u00e1m n\u011bkdo \u0159ekne: \u201eJestli ti na na\u0161em vztahu z\u00e1le\u017e\u00ed, tak to pro m\u011b ud\u011bl\u00e1\u0161.\u201c Snadno se v n\u011bm aktivuje pot\u0159eba dokazovat, \u017ee v\u00e1m z\u00e1le\u017e\u00ed. Jen\u017ee podm\u00ednka je u\u017e sama o sob\u011b problematick\u00e1: l\u00e1ska, loajalita nebo spolupr\u00e1ce jsou pou\u017eity jako argument proti va\u0161\u00ed svobod\u011b rozhodnout se.<\/p>\n

Klidn\u00e1 autorita by v takov\u00e9 chv\u00edli nemusela dokazovat opak. M\u016f\u017ee \u0159\u00edct: \u201eTo, \u017ee to te\u010f neud\u011bl\u00e1m, neznamen\u00e1, \u017ee mi na vztahu nez\u00e1le\u017e\u00ed. Znamen\u00e1 to, \u017ee do toho nejdu t\u00edmto zp\u016fsobem.\u201c Nejde o slovn\u00ed v\u00edt\u011bzstv\u00ed. Jde o odm\u00edtnut\u00ed p\u0159ijmout ciz\u00ed definici situace.<\/p>\n

N\u011bkdy druh\u00fd po jasn\u00e9 odpov\u011bdi p\u0159itvrd\u00ed. Pr\u00e1v\u011b tehdy se uk\u00e1\u017ee, zda byla hranice skute\u010dn\u00e1, nebo jen n\u00e1vrh. Pokud po ka\u017ed\u00e9m odporu p\u0159id\u00e1te dal\u0161\u00ed vysv\u011btlen\u00ed, omluvu nebo \u00fastupek, druh\u00fd dost\u00e1v\u00e1 zpr\u00e1vu, \u017ee sta\u010d\u00ed vydr\u017eet. Pokud naopak reagujete trestem, sarkasmem \u010di pon\u00ed\u017een\u00edm, vztah mo\u017en\u00e1 uml\u010d\u00edte, ale d\u016fv\u011bru t\u00edm obvykle nepos\u00edl\u00edte.<\/p>\n

Stabiln\u011bj\u0161\u00ed pozice b\u00fdv\u00e1 m\u00e9n\u011b n\u00e1padn\u00e1: uznat emoci, neustoupit z v\u011bci a nenechat se vt\u00e1hnout do nekone\u010dn\u00e9ho kruhu. \u201eVid\u00edm, \u017ee t\u011b to roz\u010diluje. Rozhodnut\u00ed se nem\u011bn\u00ed.\u201c Tato v\u011bta nen\u00ed univerz\u00e1ln\u00ed recept. V n\u011bkter\u00fdch vztaz\u00edch by mohla p\u016fsobit p\u0159\u00edli\u0161 stroze, jinde je p\u0159esn\u011b t\u00edm, co zastav\u00ed chaotick\u00e9 vyjedn\u00e1v\u00e1n\u00ed. Z\u00e1le\u017e\u00ed na kontextu, historii vztahu i na tom, zda druh\u00fd reaguje na jednu konkr\u00e9tn\u00ed frustraci, nebo systematicky testuje, kam a\u017e m\u016f\u017ee zaj\u00edt.<\/p>\n

Klid nen\u00ed tot\u00e9\u017e co odpojen\u00ed<\/h2>\n

N\u011bkte\u0159\u00ed lid\u00e9 se sna\u017e\u00ed b\u00fdt netvrd\u00ed t\u00edm, \u017ee zcela potla\u010d\u00ed vlastn\u00ed reakci. Mluv\u00ed ti\u0161e, v\u011bcn\u011b a kontrolovan\u011b, ale uvnit\u0159 jsou sta\u017een\u00ed. Druh\u00fd pak mo\u017en\u00e1 nesly\u0161\u00ed k\u0159ik, p\u0159esto c\u00edt\u00ed odstup, led nebo nevy\u0159\u010den\u00fd hn\u011bv. To nen\u00ed klid. To je \u010dasto obrana p\u0159ed konfliktem.<\/p>\n

Skute\u010dn\u00fd klid m\u016f\u017ee obsahovat i nepohodl\u00ed. M\u016f\u017eete b\u00fdt rozzloben\u00ed a p\u0159itom neponi\u017eovat. M\u016f\u017eete b\u00fdt pevn\u00ed a p\u0159itom nevyn\u00e1\u0161et rozsudek nad charakterem druh\u00e9ho. M\u016f\u017eete \u0159\u00edct: \u201eTohle m\u011b zas\u00e1hlo a nechci v tom pokra\u010dovat,\u201c ani\u017e byste museli dokazovat, \u017ee druh\u00fd je \u0161patn\u00fd \u010dlov\u011bk.<\/p>\n

Pr\u00e1v\u011b zde se autorita op\u00edr\u00e1 o vnit\u0159n\u00ed stabilitu. Ne o to, \u017ee nic nec\u00edt\u00edte, ale o to, \u017ee va\u0161e jedn\u00e1n\u00ed ne\u0159\u00edd\u00ed prvn\u00ed vlna strachu, viny nebo vzteku. \u010clov\u011bk, kter\u00fd dok\u00e1\u017ee un\u00e9st nespokojenost druh\u00e9ho bez okam\u017eit\u00e9ho \u00fastupu a bez proti\u00fatoku, nevytv\u00e1\u0159\u00ed tlak nav\u00edc. Vytv\u00e1\u0159\u00ed p\u0159edv\u00eddatelnost.<\/p>\n

A p\u0159edv\u00eddatelnost je ve vztaz\u00edch \u010dasto mnohem bezpe\u010dn\u011bj\u0161\u00ed ne\u017e laskavost, kter\u00e1 jednou povol\u00ed v\u0161echno a podruh\u00e9 exploduje. Druh\u00fd nemus\u00ed b\u00fdt z va\u0161eho rozhodnut\u00ed nad\u0161en\u00fd. Pot\u0159ebuje ale postupn\u011b v\u011bd\u011bt, \u017ee va\u0161e \u201eano\u201c znamen\u00e1 ano, va\u0161e \u201ene\u201c znamen\u00e1 ne a \u017ee bl\u00edzkost nen\u00ed podm\u00edn\u011bn\u00e1 t\u00edm, zda se v\u00e1m pr\u00e1v\u011b poda\u0159\u00ed vyhnout ka\u017ed\u00e9mu nap\u011bt\u00ed.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Jak udr\u017eet autoritu bez tvrdosti ve chv\u00edli, kdy druh\u00fd tla\u010d\u00ed nebo zpochyb\u0148uje hranice. Klidn\u00e1 jasnost chr\u00e1n\u00ed vztah, vlastn\u00ed \u00fasudek i hranice pod tlakem.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":""},"categories":[112],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-33903","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-vzorce-chovani-a-reakce"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.martinaocadlikova.cz\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33903","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.martinaocadlikova.cz\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.martinaocadlikova.cz\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.martinaocadlikova.cz\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.martinaocadlikova.cz\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=33903"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.martinaocadlikova.cz\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33903\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.martinaocadlikova.cz\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=33903"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.martinaocadlikova.cz\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=33903"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.martinaocadlikova.cz\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=33903"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}