At the start, it often feels intense. Attention, interest, a sense of being chosen. The other person is present, attuned, convincing. The connection has a clear charge to it, and you feel truly seen. Then something begins to shift. Not necessarily dramatically, more often gradually.
Reactions that used to be fine suddenly become “too much.”Questions are interpreted as pressure. Needs are labeled excessive.What once created closeness begins to create tension. Attention alternates with coldness. Closeness with distance. Certainty with doubt. And you start thinking more about yourself than about the relationship. This isn’t necessarily about a diagnosis. It’s about a dynamic.
A dynamic that gradually disrupts orientation
In some relationships, a pattern repeats with a similar structure:
- strong initial closeness
- gradual criticism or undermining
- withdrawal, coldness, silence
- a return of attention
- and then again
This cycle may not be conscious or planned. But if it repeats, it begins to affect how reality is perceived. You start wondering:
- Am I reacting appropriately?
- Am I “too much.”
- Should I be more patient?
- Am I missing something?
Over time, confidence in your own judgment can weaken not because of one situation, but because of repetition.
What changes inside this kind of contact
When a relationship is stable, even difficult moments can be named and worked through. But when the contact becomes unstable, your behavior inside the relationship begins to change. You may notice:
- greater caution in how you express yourself
- attempts to prevent the other person’s reactions
- adapting yourself to keep the peace
- trying to maintain the connection at the cost of your own discomfort
This rarely happens all at once. It happens quietly. And that’s why it can be hard to tell the difference between normal relational tension and a dynamic that gradually erodes you over time.
Why it’s hard to leave
Because a relationship isn’t only the present. It also contains the beginning. History. Closeness. A period when it worked. And often, something functional still remains something that makes sense. That complicates orientation. There are also alternating phases:
- moments of closeness
- moments of distance
That alternation can create strong attachment not to how the relationship functions overall, but to how it functions in certain moments.
When it makes sense to pay attention
Not in the middle of a single argument. In the presence of a repeating pattern. When, over time, you notice:
- doubt in your own perception
- a growing need to adapt yourself
- insecurity that wasn’t there before
- relief when the other person is away
- tension even during “calm” periods
This isn’t about quick conclusions or labels. It’s about taking a more precise look at how the relationship actually functions over time.
It’s not about naming the other person
Words like “narcissism” are used frequently sometimes too quickly. For orientation, it’s often more useful to track the concrete dynamic:
- What keeps repeating in this contact?
- Does anything shift when I name what’s happening?
- Is there room for response or mostly for defense?
- Does this relationship strengthen stability, or gradually weaken it?
The answers to these questions are often more accurate than any label.
Returning to your own perception
When someone is inside a dynamic like this, it’s rarely about an immediate decision. More often, it’s a gradual return to one’s own judgment. To see: what is actually happening, what keeps repeating, and what effect it has. Without pressure for a quick solution. Without dramatic conclusions. But with greater precision about how the relationship truly works. And that precision is often the first step toward change.
English (UK) 
Čeština